Showing posts with label proofreading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proofreading. Show all posts

Monday, 14 January 2019

MICROSOFT TEXT-TO-SPEECH

A few years ago, I wrote a post on reading aloud when editing/proofreading. I recently discovered an improvement on this in the text-to-speech function in Microsoft Word and now use it for all my editing work.


MICROSOFT TEXT-TO-SPEECH


 ADVANTAGES

  •  I can use this feature silently with headphones, so I don’t annoy those around me.
  • There’s less chance of people doubting my sanity as it doesn’t involve talking to myself. 😉
  • Humans often see what they expect to see and may overlook errors when reading aloud (such as consecutive articles, e.g. “the the”). Text-to-speech avoids this problem.

 DISADVANTAGES

  • I have had issues with the response to “play” and and have often had to click on this two or three times.*
  • Pronunciation is often incorrect. (Its interpretation of chemical formulae can be interesting!)
  • There is a choice of voices (sometimes); however, the voice occasionally changes so that it sounds like several people speaking together, which is difficult to listen to. This can usually be resolved by stopping and restarting playback.

    I’d love to hear about other people’s experience with this function.

    Photo credit: Toshiyuki IMAI


    *18/01/19 This issue appears to have been resolved in a recent update.

    Sunday, 28 October 2018

    MICROSOFT 'FIND' FUNCTION AS AN EDITING TOOL

    The ‘Find’ tool in Microsoft Word is invaluable for editing, as it searches for a character, word or phrase and shows how many times this occurs within a manuscript. Up and down arrows (Figure 1) within the navigation panel are used to identify all the occurrences of the search subject.

     Figure 1.

    As errors in manuscripts are often repeated, I use ‘Find’ to ensure that all recurring errors are identified and corrected. Additionally, I routinely use it to search for frequently occurring errors, including misuse of ‘respectively’; missing commas before ‘which’; incorrect use of hyphens, en-dashes and minus signs; double spaces and spaces before punctuation.

    Left or right brackets may be omitted. When their numbers differ, I scroll through each instance of the most frequently occurring bracket to identify the missing one(s). Where right parentheses outnumber left ones, this may be because the author has used only right parentheses to label parts of figures (e.g. ‘a)’).

    With hyphenated words, ‘Find’ can be used to ensure consistency by searching for occurrences of a given word pair, first hyphenated and then unhyphenated.

    When editing academic papers, I scan numbered reference citations to ensure that they are cited in numerical order. When these are enclosed in square brackets, they can be easily checked by using ‘Find’ to search for a left or right square bracket. I also use ‘Find’ to search for ‘fig’, ‘table’ and ‘scheme’, where appropriate, to check that all the graphics in a paper have been cited.

    Character searches are useful for checking units when editing scientific papers, e.g. to check that spaces are present/absent between the value and the unit, depending on the unit and style requirements.

    I edit documents in both British and US English, which means changing spelling and grammar that is specific to US English to the British version, and vice versa.
    When editing documents in British English, searching for ‘z’ can identify many US spellings, as these tend to replace the ‘ise’ at the end of British words with ‘ize’ (e.g. neutralise/neutralize). Oxford commas (which are more commonly used in US English) can be identified, if required, by searching for ‘, and’.
    When editing US English manuscripts, searching for ‘our’ identifies British spellings, since US words frequently replace ‘our’ in British spellings with ‘or’; for example, behaviour (behavior), colour (color) and favour (favor). A search for ‘ise’ also identifies British English words for which US spellings replace the ending ‘ise’ in British spellings with ‘ize’. However, some words (such as comprise) retain ‘ise’ in US English.
    Words related to sulphur are spelled with ‘ph’ in British spellings and ‘f’ in the US; searching for ‘sulf’ identifies US spellings while searching for ‘sulph’ identifies British ones.

    These tips are based on my own editing experience. I hope they are useful.

    © Linda Watson, 2018






    Friday, 3 July 2015

    ALWAYS READ ALOUD

    As an editor, I find that reading documents aloud helps me to spot mistakes; errors in grammar generally spoil the flow of the text, so reading aloud makes them stand out. (Fortunately, I work from home, so only my family hears me talking to myself. 😊)


    The saying "there is nothing new under the sun" comes from the book of Ecclesiastes (1:9), and it is true. Reading aloud was something I worked out for myself 'on the job', but I've since found many articles advising proofreaders (and others whose work is concerned with English grammar) to read work aloud. Here are just a few examples:


    To help develop an instinctive feel for the flow of a sentence, try reading it aloud and insert a comma when you pause . . .
    (Let’s eat Grandma! How to use, and not use the comma, David Marsh, The Guardian)



    Even if you’re just whispering away at your desk, reading aloud is a great way to find and spot mistakes, especially missing punctuation or repeated words.
    (3 Things You Should Do When Speed Proofreading, Grammarly)



    Read aloud - small errors of expression and punctuation are more likely to become obvious if you read aloud.
    (Effective proof reading, University of Reading)



    . . . when you read out loud, you can't help but stumble over typos and missing words.
    (My Favorite Editing Tip: Read it Aloud, Kate Kiefer Lee)